Ordinary moral thought recognizes moral duties that are relational as well as duties that are impersonal. A relational moral duty is owed to another person, such that she is wronged by its breach.66 By contrast, an impersonal moral duty is owed to no one, or (perhaps) owed to the world at large. Suppose, for example, that A has reason to believe that detonating a piece of dynamite would destroy an ancient and beautiful cave that no one will ever see. Absent some good reason to do so, it would plausibly be morally wrong for A to detonate the dynamite, but doing so would not wrong anyone else — it would simply be wrong, full stop. If, by contrast, A has reason to believe that detonating the dynamite will kill another person, B, or destroy her property, then A’s duty not to detonate the dynamite is owed to B, such that he would wrong her by breaching this duty.67
2026年03月27日 09:33:49
，详情可参考snipaste截图
从记忆号码到钻研技术：通信女工程师二十二载守护方寸机房，更多细节参见Line下载
蓝色拆线代表毛利润（率）、彩色堆叠柱代表费用（率）。只有蓝色淹没彩色，才能获得经营利润。